Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 has a general score of 85.5, which is much better than the realme X50 Pro 5G's global score of 74.9. Both devices we are comparing have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A51 has a more recent 11 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version, so it counts with some extra features. Galaxy A51's design is lighter and thinner than realme X50 Pro 5G, although they were released with only a few months difference.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a just a little greater pixel density. Realme X50 Pro 5G features a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has more RAM memory.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features a bit better camera than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a much higher resolution back-facing camera, a bigger sensor providing a better image quality and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light images and video.
Galaxy A51 has a lot bigger memory to store more games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A51 also has an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A51, because it has a 5 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.