Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is way better than realme X50 Pro 5G's general score of 74.9. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter phone than realme X50 Pro 5G, even though both of them were released only a few months apart. Both devices we are comparing here come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has newer 11 version and realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version.
Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a just a little greater pixel density. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a way bigger memory for games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 cpu cores. The realme X50 Pro 5G features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video resolution, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a larger camera aperture, a larger camera sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures and a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera.
Galaxy A51 5G has just a little bit longer battery life than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.