Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is way better than realme X50 Pro 5G's general score of 74.9. Galaxy A52 5G is a newer cellphone, and it is also a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner than realme X50 Pro 5G. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10, providing you a lot of extra features and performance enhancements.
The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 CPU cores. Realme X50 Pro 5G has a more vivid display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a quite better screen pixels density.
Galaxy A52 5G features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1 TB. Realme X50 Pro 5G and Galaxy A52 5G count with incredibly similar cameras, both of them have the same video resolution, a 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, the same diafragm aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same camera sensor size.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a little better battery duration than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.