Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A6 has a general score of 75.8, which is slightly better than the realme X50 Pro 5G's global score of 74.9. Even though the Galaxy A6 is older than the realme X50 Pro 5G, it's body is somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter. The realme X50 Pro 5G has a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a better quantity of pixels per inch of display and a little larger screen.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features a superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has more RAM. Realme X50 Pro 5G features a little bit better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The realme X50 Pro 5G shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures, it also counts with a much better video quality, a way bigger sensor providing a way better image quality and a way higher 64 MP resolution back facing camera.
The realme X50 Pro 5G features a much longer battery duration than Galaxy A6, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.