Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) has an overall score of 75.8, which is a bit better than the realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 overall score. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) is an way older phone than the realme X50 Pro 5G, but it's somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter anyway. Realme X50 Pro 5G has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a just a little higher screen pixel density, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little larger screen.
Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Realme X50 Pro 5G takes a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a bigger aperture, a camera in the back with much more mega pixels and a way better video resolution. The realme X50 Pro 5G has just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 17 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.