Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A70 has a global score of 76.9, which is a bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G's global score of 74.9. These phones work with the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so both should count with very similar operating system features. Despite of the fact that Galaxy A70 is older than the realme X50 Pro 5G, it's construction is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A70. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. Realme X50 Pro 5G has a sharper screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality.
Galaxy A70 counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A70 also has an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB. Galaxy A70 has just a bit longer battery performance than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.