Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a score of 92.9, which is way better than realme X50 Pro 5G's global score of 74.9. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's body is just a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than realme X50 Pro 5G, although both were released only a few months apart. Both devices we compare here have the same Android 10 OS, so they should provide the user identical operating system features.
Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The realme X50 Pro 5G features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a just a little better screen density.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much better storage for apps and games than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little bit better camera than realme X50 Pro 5G. Both of them have the same sensor size, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same (4K) video quality, a same size diafragm aperture and the same resolution camera.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with just a bit longer battery duration than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.