Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2018-01-06 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) has a general score of 79.2, which is slightly better than the realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 general score. Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018)'s body is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner than the realme X50 Pro 5G, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Realme X50 Pro 5G has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a just a bit lower screen density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit larger screen.
The Galaxy A8 (2018) has just a bit bigger storage capacity for applications and games than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a 4200mAh battery size. Realme X50 Pro 5G takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting pictures and videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way more megapixels back facing camera and a much higher (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.