Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is much better than the realme X50 Pro 5G, having a overall score of 85.2 against 74.9. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) body is somewhat lighter and thinner than the realme X50 Pro 5G, although it was released only 16 months before. Realme X50 Pro 5G features a brighter display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a little bit better count of pixels per inch of screen and a bit larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB. The realme X50 Pro 5G has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A9 (2018). Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
The realme X50 Pro 5G features just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity instead of 3800mAh. Realme X50 Pro 5G takes better photos and videos than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a way bigger sensor shooting way higher quality photographs and videos and a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.