Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is much better than the realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 score. Galaxy F62's design is newer, but a bit heavier and a bit thicker than realme X50 Pro 5G. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy F62 has a more recent 11 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version, offering some additional features and performance improvements.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has a little more vivid display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with much more brightness and a bit more pixels per screen inch. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have a 6 GB RAM, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has more CPU cores.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy F62. They have a camera in the back with a 64 megapixels, the same camera sensor size, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rate and a F1.8 aperture. Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1 TB.
Galaxy F62 counts with a much better battery lifetime than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a 7000mAh battery size instead of 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.