Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is a lot better than the realme X50 Pro 5G, with a general score of 97.6 against 74.9. Even though Galaxy Fold and realme X50 Pro 5G were released with only a few months difference, the Galaxy Fold body is way heavier but also extremely thinner than realme X50 Pro 5G. Both phones in this review include Android OS, but the Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version.
Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better pixel quantity per inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has 384 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a bit faster CPU than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy Fold features just a little better battery lifetime than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a 4% larger battery size. Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light captures and videos and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a lot bigger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and pictures and a camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.