Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2021-03-18 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black, blue and white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | PLS |
| 411 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M12 is a little bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G, with a general score of 80 against 74.9. Samsung Galaxy M12 is a newer device than realme X50 Pro 5G, although it's a bit thicker and just a little heavier. Both of these phones include the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding that.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy M12, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Realme X50 Pro 5G has a lot better screen than Galaxy M12, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher display pixels density and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Galaxy M12 features a superior memory capacity for applications and games than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy M12 counts with a superior battery duration than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Realme X50 Pro 5G shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy M12, because it has a much better video definition, a larger camera aperture for better captures and videos in low-light situations and a lot more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.