Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M20 has a general score of 78.9, which is slightly better than the realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 global score. Galaxy M20 is a a bit lighter cellphone than the realme X50 Pro 5G, but both have the same thickness. Both phones in our current comparison work with the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect.
The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has more RAM. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a better display than Galaxy M20, because it has a quite bigger screen, a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit higher pixel amount in each inch of display.
The Galaxy M20 has a bigger storage to install applications and games than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Realme X50 Pro 5G features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a much higher 64 megapixels resolution back camera, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a larger camera aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited situations and a lot bigger sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photographs.
The Galaxy M20 features improved battery life than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.