Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 84.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-03-23 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Midnight blue and Raven black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M21 is better than realme X50 Pro 5G, getting an 84.1 score against 74.9. These phones include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy M21 has a more recent 11 version and realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10, offering a lot of extra features. The Samsung Galaxy M21 is a a bit lighter cellphone than realme X50 Pro 5G, but both of them have the same thickness.
The realme X50 Pro 5G features just a bit better performance than Galaxy M21, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has more RAM memory. The realme X50 Pro 5G features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M21, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, way more brightness and a little bit more pixels per inch in the display.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy M21, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a bigger diafragm aperture, a camera in the back with a way higher resolution and a larger sensor which offers a better photo and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy M21 features a bigger storage for apps and games than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy M21 has a much longer battery duration than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.