Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M30 is a bit better than the realme X50 Pro 5G, getting a overall score of 82.4 against 74.9. Although the Samsung Galaxy M30 is older than realme X50 Pro 5G, it's design is lighter and a bit thinner. These phones work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy M30 has 9.0 Pie version and realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10, providing the user a lot of extra features.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M30. Both have a 6 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy M30, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit greater count of pixels in each inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy M30 has a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy M30 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M30 has longer battery performance than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The realme X50 Pro 5G captures a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a bigger aperture to take better low-light captures, a much better video resolution, a much bigger camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality and a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.