Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-06-18 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M40 has an overall score of 85, which is better than the realme X50 Pro 5G's general score of 74.9. These phones have the same Android 10 operating system, so both should count with very similar OS features. Galaxy M40's design is thinner and lighter than the realme X50 Pro 5G, even though both of them were released with only a couple months difference.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has a little faster CPU than Galaxy M40. Both have a 6 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit. The realme X50 Pro 5G features a sharper screen than Galaxy M40, because it has a quite bigger display, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a quite better pixels density.
Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a superior camera than Galaxy M40, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a camera in the back with lot more megapixels and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality.
Galaxy M40 has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy M40 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB. The realme X50 Pro 5G has improved battery duration than Galaxy M40, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.