Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 411 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 is much better than the realme X50 Pro 5G, getting an 87.7 score against 74.9. Samsung Galaxy M51's design is a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker than realme X50 Pro 5G. Both phones we compare here use the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding that.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features a brighter display than Galaxy M51, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels density and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. Galaxy M51 features a much better storage to install applications and games than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy M51 also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M51. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit. The realme X50 Pro 5G features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same aperture, the same video frame rate and the same resolution back camera, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a larger sensor shooting better quality photos.
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a way better battery life than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a 67 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.