Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is much better than the realme X50 Pro 5G, having a score of 90.8 against 74.9. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a just a little thinner and a little lighter device than the realme X50 Pro 5G, although both of them were released only 6 months apart. The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little faster CPU than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features a more vivid display than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a just a bit greater display density. The Galaxy Note 20 has as much memory for apps and games as the realme X50 Pro 5G, both of them have exactly the same internal memory.
Realme X50 Pro 5G takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same video resolution and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, faster 30 frames per second video frame rates and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features just a bit better battery lifetime than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.