Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the realme X50 Pro 5G, getting a 98.9 score against 74.9. Even though Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and realme X50 Pro 5G were released only 6 months apart, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is a little heavier but just a bit thinner. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a bit smaller screen and a just a little worse amount of pixels per screen inch. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little better performance than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a better camera than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a much more megapixels back-facing camera and a way higher video quality. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little better battery performance than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.