Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is a little bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G, getting an 81.2 score against 74.9. These phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 3 has an older 5.0 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version. Galaxy Note 3's body is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner than the realme X50 Pro 5G, although it was released many years before.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a just a little higher screen pixel density, a bit bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The realme X50 Pro 5G features slightly more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores and 3 GB more RAM memory. The realme X50 Pro 5G has better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a way better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a larger aperture, a much larger back camera sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality and a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.