Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 5 is slightly better than realme X50 Pro 5G, getting a 79.3 score against 74.9. Both phones we compare here include Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 5 has the previous 5.1 version and realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10. Although Galaxy Note 5 is noticeably older than the realme X50 Pro 5G, it's construction is lighter and thinner.
The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has more RAM and more CPU cores. Galaxy Note 5 features a bit sharper screen than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater display pixel density.
The realme X50 Pro 5G takes much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a bigger camera aperture to take better low light photography and a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution camera.
The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Realme X50 Pro 5G features a much better battery performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 40% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.