Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is slightly better than the realme X50 Pro 5G, getting a overall score of 80.4 against 74.9. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is an extremely older cellphone than realme X50 Pro 5G, but Samsung was able to build it thinner and lighter. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a just a little worse number of pixels per inch of screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bit bigger display.
Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy Note Fan Edition has slightly more storage for applications and games than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
The realme X50 Pro 5G features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for taking photos and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a way bigger camera sensor and a way more MP camera.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 31 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.