Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has an overall score of 89, which is better than the realme X50 Pro 5G's overall score of 74.9. Even when Samsung Galaxy Note10 and realme X50 Pro 5G were released with only 7 months difference, Samsung Galaxy Note10 is thinner and somewhat lighter. Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a CPU that is just as good as the realme X50 Pro 5G one, and although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a higher amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a much better screen than Galaxy Note10, because it has a just a bit more pixels per screen inch, a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bigger screen. Realme X50 Pro 5G has a superior camera than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier aperture and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way higher quality videos and photos.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a much better storage for apps and games than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. Realme X50 Pro 5G features better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note10, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.