Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a global score of 86.2, which is much better than the realme X50 Pro 5G's global score of 74.9. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a newer 11 version and realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite construction is a bit thinner and just a bit lighter than realme X50 Pro 5G, although both were only released with a couple of months difference.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite. They have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. Realme X50 Pro 5G has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a little better pixels density.
Realme X50 Pro 5G shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera and a much larger sensor.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Galaxy Note10 Lite has a bit superior battery duration than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.