Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note3 has a general score of 77.7, which is a little bit better than the realme X50 Pro 5G's overall score of 74.9. Even though Galaxy Note3 is extremely older than the realme X50 Pro 5G, it's design is lighter and a bit thinner. These phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy Note3 has the newer 4.4.2 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10, offering some nice extra features.
The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a little bit larger screen and a just a little better pixels quantity in each display inch. Realme X50 Pro 5G has a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a greater number of cores (and faster) and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The realme X50 Pro 5G captures greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a larger camera aperture to capture better low light photography, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality and a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features a little bit better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note3, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Realme X50 Pro 5G features superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 31 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.