Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note4 is slightly better than realme X50 Pro 5G, with a global score of 77.6 against 74.9. The Galaxy Note4 body is lighter and a little bit thinner than the realme X50 Pro 5G, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a little bit larger display. Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a bigger aperture to take better photos in poorly lited situations, a back camera with a way higher resolution and a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has a 30 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.