Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a score of 80.2, which is just a bit better than the realme X50 Pro 5G's score of 74.9. The Samsung Galaxy Note5 body is somewhat thinner and lighter than realme X50 Pro 5G, although it was released many years before. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a bit lower amount of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit larger display.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The realme X50 Pro 5G shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a bigger aperture, a way more MP camera in the back and a way larger back camera sensor capturing way better quality pictures.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note5, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 40% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.