Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 is just a bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G, with a 79.5 score against 74.9. Samsung Galaxy Note7's body is thinner and lighter than realme X50 Pro 5G, although it was released 4 years before. The realme X50 Pro 5G has a little sharper screen than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a just a little inferior pixel number in each inch of screen, it also counts with a quite larger display.
The realme X50 Pro 5G features a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a larger number of faster cores. The Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity for games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has longer battery duration than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity. Realme X50 Pro 5G features a much better camera than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photographs and a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.