Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-05 | 2017-09-15 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note8 has a general score of 83, which is much better than the realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 score. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note8 has 9.0 Pie version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version, providing you some nice extra features. The Galaxy Note8 body is a bit thinner and just a little lighter than realme X50 Pro 5G, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has a bit sharper display than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a way worse 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a quite larger display. The Galaxy Note8 features a little bit better memory for apps and games than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has just a little better processing power than Galaxy Note8. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note8, because it has a 27 percent greater battery size. The realme X50 Pro 5G shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.