Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2020-03-05 | 2018-01-09 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 411 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy On7 Prime has a general score of 76.9, which is just a bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G's general score of 74.9. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy On7 Prime is much older than realme X50 Pro 5G, it's body is somewhat lighter and thinner. These devices use Android operating system, but the Galaxy On7 Prime has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version, so it provides you a lot of extra features and increased performance.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has a more vivid screen than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a larger display, a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit better count of pixels in each screen inch. Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime counts with a bit more storage capacity for apps and games than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy On7 Prime, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. Realme X50 Pro 5G captures way better photographs and videos than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a much larger sensor providing a lot better image quality, a larger diafragm aperture and a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has superior battery life than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.