Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 is much better than the realme X50 Pro 5G, getting an 88.3 score against 74.9. Samsung Galaxy S10's body is incredibly lighter and thinner than realme X50 Pro 5G, even though it was released only 12 months before. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has a more recent 11 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10, providing you some extra features and performance tweaks.
Realme X50 Pro 5G and Samsung Galaxy S10 feature very similar CPUs, and although the Samsung Galaxy S10 has a greater amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy S10, because although it has a lot worse pixel density and a way worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a quite larger screen.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features a much better camera than Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photography and videos and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor taking lot better quality photos and a way more MP back facing camera.
The Galaxy S10 features a much greater storage to install applications and games than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy S10 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. The realme X50 Pro 5G has improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.