Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a score of 93.6, which is way better than realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 score. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is an older phone than the realme X50 Pro 5G, but Samsung made it thinner and just a little lighter. These phones work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a more recent 11 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version, counting with lots of additional features and a performance increase.
The Galaxy S10 5G's CPU is very similar to the realme X50 Pro 5G one, and although the Galaxy S10 5G has 2 GB more RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Realme X50 Pro 5G has just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, although it has a quite lower pixel density, a little smaller display and a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has more internal memory. The realme X50 Pro 5G has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting images and videos in low-light environments and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a lot larger sensor which provides a much better image and video quality and a camera in the back with a way better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit longer battery performance than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a 7 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.