Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is better than realme X50 Pro 5G, getting an 89.7 score against 74.9. Galaxy S10 Lite is a a little lighter and just a bit thinner cellphone than realme X50 Pro 5G, even when they were released only 1 months apart. The realme X50 Pro 5G and the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite both have really similar processing units, and although the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has 2 GB more RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a bit better screen density. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a lot bigger storage for applications and games than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a little better battery life than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Realme X50 Pro 5G shoots clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels, a larger back-facing camera sensor and a larger aperture to capture better low light photography and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.