Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e is much better than the realme X50 Pro 5G, getting a general score of 86.3 against 74.9. Although the Galaxy S10e is older than the realme X50 Pro 5G, it's construction is somewhat thinner and notably lighter. Realme X50 Pro 5G features a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a bit lower pixels amount in each inch of screen, it also counts with a little bigger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Galaxy S10e features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy S10e also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy S10e's CPU is very similar to the realme X50 Pro 5G one, they have a Octa-Core CPU and 6 GB of RAM memory.
Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 35 percent bigger battery size. Realme X50 Pro 5G takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has worse video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture which is not good for taking pictures or videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a way larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs and a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.