Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 has a general score of 94.8, which is much better than the realme X50 Pro 5G's global score of 74.9. These devices come with Android OS, but Galaxy S20 has a more recent 13 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10. Even when the Galaxy S20 and the realme X50 Pro 5G were released only 0 months apart, the Galaxy S20 is somewhat thinner and notably lighter.
Galaxy S20 counts with a bit better performance than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S20 also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The realme X50 Pro 5G features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S20, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a much worse pixel amount per inch of display, it also counts with a little larger display.
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a very superior storage to install applications and games than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, a 0.59 inches camera sensor and a same size diafragm aperture, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera and better 30 fps video frame rate.
The realme X50 Pro 5G features just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S20, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.