Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is much better than realme X50 Pro 5G, having a overall score of 90.8 against 74.9. The Galaxy S20 FE is a a little lighter and a little thinner device than the realme X50 Pro 5G, although they were released only a couple of months apart. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 FE has a more recent 11 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10, giving you some extra features and performance improvements.
Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a just a little greater count of pixels per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE and realme X50 Pro 5G both feature really similar processors, both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has a much better camera than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a bigger sensor and a camera in the back with much more mega pixels. Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 FE features a bit better battery performance than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.