Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is a lot better than realme X50 Pro 5G's general score of 74.9. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a a bit heavier device than realme X50 Pro 5G, but they are equally thin. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has newer 13 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version, counting with some nice extra features and a performance increase.
Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a lot lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little inferior quantity of pixels per screen inch and a quite smaller display. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little bit better performance than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much greater memory to install applications and games than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features better battery performance than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better camera than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor taking lower quality pictures and videos, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels camera and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.