Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 9 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has an overall score of 93.4, which is a lot better than the realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 overall score. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has a newer 13 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version. Samsung Galaxy S22 is a newer phone, and it's also lighter and somewhat thinner than realme X50 Pro 5G.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 features a little bit better looking display than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a brighter display and a just a little greater number of pixels in each inch of display. The realme X50 Pro 5G has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy S22, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy S22 features as much storage to store more apps and games as the realme X50 Pro 5G one, both have equal internal memory capacity. Galaxy S22 takes just a bit better photographs and videos than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has a back camera with much less mega pixels resolution, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S22 also counts with a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.