Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is a lot better than the realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 global score. The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a somewhat heavier phone than realme X50 Pro 5G, but both are equally thin. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version while realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with just a bit better looking screen than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a quite larger display, a little bit greater pixel count in each inch in the screen, a lot brighter screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy S22 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to the realme X50 Pro 5G one, both of them have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with better battery lifetime than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a superior camera than realme X50 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a way better video resolution, a way bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.