Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-05 | -- |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.23 ounces | -- |
| Moss green and Rust red | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 has a global score of 82.6, which is better than the realme X50 Pro 5G's score of 74.9. Both phones in this review use Android operating system, but Galaxy S25 has a more recent 14 version and realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10, so it provides the user a lot of extra features. The Galaxy S25 is a much lighter and noticeably thinner cellphone than the realme X50 Pro 5G.
The Galaxy S25 features a bit better screen than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little bit better pixels count in each inch of display and way more brightness. Galaxy S25 features as much storage to store more games and applications as the realme X50 Pro 5G, both of them have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has a very superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy S25 features a little bit better camera than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has a way less MP resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a larger camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a bit longer battery life than Galaxy S25, because it has a 5 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.