Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.08 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is a bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G, with a global score of 77.8 against 74.9. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a newer 4.4.2 version and realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10 version, so it gives a couple nice extra features and performance optimizations. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is a incredibly lighter cellphone than realme X50 Pro 5G, but both have the same thickness.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores. The Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a bit more vivid display than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has a much smaller screen and a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels density.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a much larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a bigger camera aperture and a much higher resolution back camera.
The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 50 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.