Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-03-05 | -- |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | -- |
| Moss green and Rust red | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a general score of 80.9, which is a little bit better than the realme X50 Pro 5G's overall score of 74.9. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has the older 5.0 version and realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10. The Galaxy S6 Active counts with just a bit better processing power than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has less RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and an additional GPU.
The Galaxy S6 Active features just a bit better display than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen density and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. Realme X50 Pro 5G features a lot better camera than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a back camera with a much better resolution, a larger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in poorly lited situations and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Realme X50 Pro 5G has better battery performance than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.