Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 is just a bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G, having a 79.5 score against 74.9. Although the Samsung Galaxy S7 is way older than the realme X50 Pro 5G, it's construction is much lighter and thinner. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 features a bit better looking screen than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has a way smaller screen and a little darker screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better count of pixels per inch in the display. The realme X50 Pro 5G has a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Realme X50 Pro 5G captures a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a lot bigger sensor and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has a way better battery life than Galaxy S7, because it has a 40% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.