Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 Active is slightly better than the realme X50 Pro 5G, with a 75.8 score against 74.9. Despite of the fact the Galaxy S7 Active is a lot older and thicker than realme X50 Pro 5G, it's body is still a bit lighter. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a larger number of cores and 2 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy S7 Active counts with a little bit better screen than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has a lot smaller display and a lot more opaque display, it also counts with a better pixel quantity per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. Realme X50 Pro 5G features more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The realme X50 Pro 5G features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a much more MP camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.