Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-03-05 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 edge has a score of 78.1, which is just a bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 global score. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S7 edge has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10, providing you some extra features. Galaxy S7 edge is an extremely older phone than realme X50 Pro 5G, but Samsung could make it incredibly lighter and thinner.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has a little sharper display than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a bit lower pixels amount in each display inch and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a larger display. Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a greater amount of RAM and 4 more processing cores. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for taking photos or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality pictures and videos and a way better 64 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 17 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.