Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 is a little bit better than the realme X50 Pro 5G, getting an 81.7 score against 74.9. Samsung Galaxy S8 is an notably older device than the realme X50 Pro 5G, but Samsung made it somewhat thinner and notably lighter. Realme X50 Pro 5G features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy S8, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
Realme X50 Pro 5G has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has a lot worse 1080 x 2400px resolution and a lot worse pixel quantity per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit larger display. Samsung Galaxy S8 features a slightly bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 256 GB.
The realme X50 Pro 5G features a much better battery life than Galaxy S8, because it has a 40 percent larger battery size. The realme X50 Pro 5G has a very superior camera than Galaxy S8, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a back camera with a lot better resolution and a much larger camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.