Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a global score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than the realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is an extremely older, just a little heavier and thicker phone than realme X50 Pro 5G. Realme X50 Pro 5G has a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has more RAM.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features a little bit better looking display than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a lot less pixels per inch in the display and a way lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little larger screen. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active counts with slightly more storage to install applications and games than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB.
Realme X50 Pro 5G features just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 5 percent greater battery size. Realme X50 Pro 5G captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photography, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality pictures and videos and a camera with a much better 64 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.