Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is better than realme X50 Pro 5G, getting a score of 83.3 against 74.9. Despite of the fact that Galaxy S9 is older than realme X50 Pro 5G, it's body is a little bit thinner and notably lighter. The realme X50 Pro 5G has a little sharper screen than Galaxy S9, because although it has a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a much worse pixel count per inch of display, it also counts with a bit larger display.
Galaxy S9 has a better memory capacity to store more apps and games than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 400 GB. The realme X50 Pro 5G features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
The realme X50 Pro 5G has a way better battery life than Galaxy S9, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Realme X50 Pro 5G has a superior camera than Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low-light photos and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the realme X50 Pro 5G also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor and a way higher resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.