Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 411 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than realme X50 Pro 5G's 74.9 score. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS, but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has newer 8.0 Oreo version and realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10. Despite being the best in this comparison, we must tell that it's also a lot thicker and heavier.
The realme X50 Pro 5G features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The realme X50 Pro 5G has a little bit better screen than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way lower display density and a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a larger display.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a better storage capacity for apps and games than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photography, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a much larger back camera sensor and a much more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a bit longer battery performance than realme X50 Pro 5G, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.