Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Moss green and Rust red | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is slightly better than realme X50 Pro 5G's global score of 74.9. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version and realme X50 Pro 5G has Android 10. Although the Galaxy XCover Pro is a better cellphone than realme X50 Pro 5G, we must note that it is also a just a little heavier and thicker cellphone.
Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the realme X50 Pro 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The realme X50 Pro 5G counts with a better display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a just a little better pixels density and a little larger display.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a better storage for games and applications than realme X50 Pro 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB. Realme X50 Pro 5G counts with just a bit better battery life than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 4200mAh battery size.
Realme X50 Pro 5G takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video resolution, a back camera with much more mega-pixels and a lot bigger back camera sensor shooting much higher quality photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.